Tuesday, November 10, 2009

Front Page Politics

If the medical evidence was substantial then I would most likely publish that the candidate has had an abortion in the past. Because she is running for office, the public has a right to know about the abortion since she is so outspoken about her opposition towards abortion. It would not be fair for her to implement policies prohibiting women from obtaining an abortion if she herself has had one. Also, it would not be fair for her to speak against abortion just to gain votes and please constituents if that is not what she truly believes. If the candidate's current position on abortion is based on her past abortion, then it should be discussed with the public so that they may better understand her view. 

No comments:

Post a Comment